THEORICAL ASPECTS IN THE MODERN ENGLISH NOVEL

Authors

  • Agron Zeqiri Associate Professor, Faculty of Philology, Department of English Language and Literature State University of Tetova, Republic of North Macedonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58885/aaj.v10i1.39.za

Keywords:

Modernism, novel, English literature, history, society, etc.

Abstract

The modern age can be considered as the age when the novel flourished. This represents the most important and probably the most popular medium of writing in modern times. We can say that English fiction is the only literary medium that can compete with film and radio. Modernism can be extensively characterized as the global social development that grabbed hold in the late nineteenth century and arrived at its top just before World War I. In the mid-twentieth century, authors, for example, Henry James and Virginia Woolf, tried different things with shifts in schedule and story perspectives. Social change requested likewise changes in verbal plans and in essential styles of articulation, and that's just the beginning. The advanced novel trials with everything—and it does as such interminably, out of a feeling that structures should maintain changing in control to match innovation, to keep individuals newly and effectively mindful of it, and to find each additional opportunity advancement may make. To match innovation, notwithstanding, was just as important for the point, for the cutting-edge writer likewise needed to oppose it—or even reclaim it. The quintessentially modern novel tends to embody a redemptive hope, reflecting a desire to restore meaning, wholeness, or beauty to the contemporary world. This is probably the most important aspect of literary works; they try to bring forward the issues that people were facing during the time those works were written, and at the same time, they try to criticize those social and historical developments, especially when the human being is downgraded morally. All these aspects form the foundation of our thesis, which we aim to explain and clarify with sufficient argumentation so that readers from any background can understand and appreciate the significance of the modern English novel.

References

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Trans.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (pp. 84–258). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Barth, J. (1969). The literature of exhaustion. In M. Klein (Ed.), The American novel since World War II (pp. 267–268). New York, NY: Fawcett.

Barth, J. (1984). The literature of exhaustion. In The Friday book: Essays and other nonfiction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Barth, J. (1996). The literature of replenishment. In M. J. Hoffman & P. D. Murphy (Eds.), Essentials of the theory of fiction (2nd ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Bergson, H. (1910). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness (F. L. Pogson, Trans.). London, UK: George Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1889)

Blackstone, B. (1946). Virginia Woolf: A commentary. London, UK: Hogarth Press.

Briggs, J. (2005). Virginia Woolf: An inner life. London, UK: Penguin.

Brooke-Rose, C. (1980). Where do we go from here? Granta, 3.

Camus, A. (1991). The myth of Sisyphus. In The myth of Sisyphus and other essays (J. O’Brien, Trans., p. 60). New York, NY: Vintage. (Original work published 1942)

De Man, P. (1991). The resistance to theory. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory (pp. 361–363). London, UK: Longman.

Eco, U. (1992). Interpretation and overinterpretation (S. Collini, Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Eisner, J., & Cardinal, R. (1994). The cultures of collecting. London, UK: Reaktion Books.

Eliot, T. S. (1972). On Virginia Woolf (1942). In J. R. Noble (Ed.), Recollections of Virginia Woolf by her contemporaries (pp. 119–122). London, UK.

Fiedler, L. (1971). Class war in British literature. In The collected essays of Leslie Fiedler (Vol. 1, pp. 410–411). New York, NY: Stein & Day.

FitzGerald, M. (1995). Making modernism: Picasso and the creation of the market for twentieth-century art. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Ford, F. M. (1924). Joseph Conrad: A personal remembrance. London, UK: Duckworth.

Forster, E. M. (1927). Aspects of the novel. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Frank, J. (1991). Spatial form in modern literature. In The idea of spatial form (pp.10–...). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. (Original work published 1945)

Fry, R. (1957). An essay in aesthetics. In Vision and design (pp. 16–38). London, UK: Chatto & Windus. (Original work published 1909)

Green, H. (1950, November 9). Communication without speech. Listener, 505–506.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (1992). Further reflections on the public sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 421–461). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hauser, A. (1962). The social history of art (Vol. 4: Naturalism to the film age). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Heisenberg, W. (1958). The physicist’s conception of nature. London, UK: Hutchinson.

Hulme, T. E. (1924). Romanticism and classicism. In H. Read (Ed.), Speculations (pp. 113–140).

Hussey, M. (1995). Virginia Woolf A–Z: The essential reference to her life and writings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Iser, W. (1991). The reading process: A phenomenological approach. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory (p. 212). London, UK: Longman.

Jensen, R. (1994). Marketing modernism in fin de siècle Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kaestle, C. (1991). Literacy in the United States: Readers and reading since 1880. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Kenner, H. (1971). The Pound era. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Kermode, F. (1968). Continuities. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Kern, S. (1983). The culture of time and space. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kline, M. (1972). Mathematical thought from ancient to modern times. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lee, H. (1996). Virginia Woolf. London, UK.

Levenson, M. (1984). A genealogy of modernism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lidderdale, J., & Nicholson, M. (1970). Dear Miss Weaver: Harriet Shaw Weaver, 1876–1961. New York, NY: Viking Press.

Little, J. (1983). Comedy and the woman writer: Woolf, Spark, and feminism. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Lodge, D. (1990). After Bakhtin: Essays on fiction and criticism. New York, NY: Routledge.

Manganaro, M. (Ed.). (1990). Modernist anthropology: From fieldwork to text. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

McAleer, J. (1992). Popular reading and publishing in Britain, 1914–1950. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

Minow-Pinkney, M. (1987). Virginia Woolf and the problem of the subject: Feminine writing in the major novels. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Moore, M. (1984). The short season between two silences: The mystical and the political in the novels of Virginia Woolf. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.

Murdoch, I. (1977). Against dryness. In M. Bradbury (Ed.), The novel today: Contemporary writers on modern fiction (pp. 23–26). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

Naipaul, V. S. (2000). Reading and writing: A personal account. New York, NY: New York Review of Books.

Naremore, J. (1973). The world without a self: Virginia Woolf and the novel. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Nin, A. (1961). Preface. In Tropic of Cancer (pp. xxxi–xxxiii). New York, NY: Grove Press.

Ohmann, R. (1996). Selling culture: Magazines, markets, and class at the turn of the century. London, UK: Verso.

Pearson, K. (1892). The grammar of science. London, UK: Walter Scott.

Rainey, L. (1997). Institutions of modernism: Literary elites and public culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Showalter, E. (2002). Lad-lit. In Z. Leader (Ed.), On modern British fiction (pp. 60–76). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Trans.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (p. 12). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1917)

Simmel, G. (1971). The metropolis and mental life. In D. N. Levine (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On individuality and social forms (pp. 325–326). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1903)

Toomer, J. (1988). Letter to Waldo Frank (September 1923). In D. T. Turner (Ed.), Cane: A Norton critical edition (p. 156). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-19 — Updated on 2026-04-15

Versions

How to Cite

Agron Zeqiri. (2026). THEORICAL ASPECTS IN THE MODERN ENGLISH NOVEL. Angloamericanae Journal (AAJ), 10(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.58885/aaj.v10i1.39.za (Original work published May 19, 2025)