The Use of Cohesive Devices in English Drama Texts for Adults and Children

Ahmed O. Al-Pachachi, Aseel A. Naser

Abstract


The present paper aims at identifying the relationship between drama texts and cohesive devices, presenting the most common used devices in both adults’ and children’s drama and comparing the percentages to find out the similarities and differences between adults’ and children’s drama concerning the use of these devices. It is hypothesized that cohesive devices have an essential role to play in making drama texts more comprehensible. It is also hypothesized that playwrights use certain cohesive devices to make their texts easier to track by readers. It is assumed that there is a difference between adults and children drama regarding the use of cohesive devices. It is found that the most used cohesive device by adults’ and children’s playwrights is reference. It is also found that ellipsis is employed widely in adults’ drama rather than children’s drama. More use of lexical cohesive devices is detected in children drama rather than adults’ drama. The study arrived at the following conclusions: First, cohesive devices are employed widely by playwrights reflecting the important role they have on the overall understanding of the writer’s main idea. It is also found that there is a relation between the age of the readers and the use of cohesive devices as adults are more able to handle certain devices rather than children.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983).Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bublitz, W. (2011).“Cohesion and coherence”.In Zienkowski, J.; Östman, J., and Verschueren, J. (Eds.).Discursive Pragmatics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.37-48

Cain, K. (2003). “Text Comprehension and Its Relation to Coherence and Cohesion in Children’s Fictional Narratives”.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, pp.335-351. Retrieved via the net: http://www.bps.org.uk

Carrel, P.L. (1989). “Cohesion is not coherence”. TESOL quarterly, 16(4), 479-488.

Chapman, L.J. (1987). Reading from 5-11 Years. London: Open University Press.

Cook-Gumberz, J. and Kyratzis, A. (2001).“Child discourse”. In Schiffrin, D.; Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H. E. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.590-610

Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Beaugrande, R. and Dressler, W. U. (1981).Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.

Ellis, D. C. (1992).From Language to communication.Hillsdal, NJ: Erlbaum

Enkvist, N. E. (1978). “Coherence, pseudo-coherence, and non-coherence.”In J.-O.Östman (Ed.), Cohesion and Semantics.Åbo: MeddelandenfrånStiftelsensförÅboAkademiForskningsinstitut, pp.109-128.

Flowerdew, J. and Mahlberg, M. (Eds.), (2009).Lexical Cohesion and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Gamble, N. and Yates, S. (2002). Exploring Children’s Literature: Teaching the Language of Reading Fiction. London: Sage.

Gee, J. (1999). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge

Gillen, J. (2003). The Language of Children. London: Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (2nded). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976).Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective. Deakin: Deakin University Press.

Hardy, D. and Leuchtmann, A. (1996). “Topic Versus Cohesion in the Prediction of Causal Ordering in English Conversation.” Discourse Processes, 21: 237-54

Hoey, M. (1991).Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hunt, P. (1999). “The world of children’s literature studies”. In Hunt, P. (Ed.), Understanding Children’s Literature: Key Essays from the International Companion Encyclopedia of Children’s Literature.London: Routledge, pp.1-14.

Iwuchukwa, O. (2008). Elements of Drama. Nigeria: National Open University of Nigeria. Retrieved via internet: www.nou.edu.ng.

Lesnik-Oberstein, K. (1999). “Essentials: What is Children’s Literature? What is childhood?” In Hunt, P. (Ed.), Understanding Children’s Literature: Key Essays from the International Companion Encyclopedia of Children’s Literature. London: Routledge, pp.1-14

Markels, R. P. (1981). “Cohesion patterns in English Expository Paragraphs”. PhD dissertation. Ohio: Ohio State University.

Martin, J. R. (2001). “Cohesion and texture”. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.35-53

McCarthy, M. (1996).Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morgan, J. L. and Sellner, M. B. (1980).“Discourse and linguistic theory.” In R. J. Spiro; B. C. Bruce, and W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp.165-200

Renkema, J. (2009). The Texture of Discourse: Towards an Outline of Connectivity Theory. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Ritchars, J. C. (Ed.). (1992). Dictionary of Language Teaching: Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.

Rush, D. (2005).A Student Guide to Play Analysis.Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tanskanen, S. K. (2006). Collaborating towards Coherence: Lexical cohesion in English Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Thornbury, S. (2005).Beyond the Sentence: Introducing Discourse Analysis. Oxford:Macmillan.

Urgelles-Coll, M. (2010).The Syntax and Semantics of Discourse Markers: Continuum Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. London: MPG.

Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Angloamericanae Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Based on a work at http://www.aaj.ielas.org

                                                                      Copyright © 2016 Angloamericanae Journal (AAJ)

                                                                                            ISSN (online) 2545-4218

Disclaimer: Articles on Angloamericanae Journal (AAJ) have been reviewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication. The Journal, Chief Editor and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any. It is the sole responsibility of the Author concerned.